Surviving the VMware Licensing Shift: How to Navigate the 72-Core Minimum and Protect Your Budget

Surviving the VMware Licensing Shift: How to Navigate the 72-Core Minimum and Protect Your Budget
Picture of Leonardo Laurencio
Leonardo Laurencio

CSO - Cybele Software

Table of contents

Introduction

On April 10, 2025, Broadcom quietly raised the bar on VMware licensing: every VMware product—from vSphere Foundation to VMware Cloud Foundation—now carries a 72-core minimum per license instance. The familiar 16-core-per-CPU rule still applies, meaning you pay whichever total is higher. For organizations running lightweight or edge workloads, this shift can translate into an immediate 200–350% increase in software spend. As Chief Sales Officer at Cybele Software, I’ve seen firsthand how this “flat-tax” approach catches many teams off-guard. But with proactive planning, strategic consolidation, and the right abstraction tools, you can not only survive the licensing shock—you can turn it into an opportunity for infrastructure modernization.
Comparison chart highlighting how Thinfinity Workspace offers infrastructure modernization, strategic consolidation, and cost control versus VMware’s licensing complexity, negative impact on small hosts, and increased costs following the April 2025 72-core licensing change.

What Changed on April 10, 2025?

Before the update, VMware’s only licensing floor was 16 cores per socket, ensuring even small servers paid for at least 16 cores. As of April 10, the new rule enforces:
  • Per-CPU minimum: still 16 cores per socket
  • Per-product minimum: now 72 cores per product instance

Example: A host with two 10-core CPUs (20 cores total)

  • Old license fee: 16 cores × 2 sockets = 32 cores
  • New license fee: 72 cores (you “shelve” 52 unused cores)
This change hits small hosts, branch offices, and test labs hardest—where actual core usage often falls well below the new floor.
Diagram showing the financial impact of VMware’s April 10, 2025 core licensing update, with new 72-core minimum fees burdening small hosts, branch offices, and test labs.

Why Broadcom Drew the 72-Core Line

Analysts widely agree that Broadcom’s motives include:
  1. Elevating the entry fee By raising the minimum, smaller customers face a higher “gate” to adopt VMware, shifting attention toward enterprise accounts.
  2. Promoting bundled products A 72-core minimum makes offerings like VMware Cloud Foundation more cost-effective per core.
  3. Simplifying SKU management Fewer SKUs and standardized minimums streamline sales and renewals for Broadcom’s teams.
While this change simplifies licensing on paper, it forces organizations to rethink capacity planning and license management strategies.

Real-World Cost Impact

Deployment Old Cores Billed New Cores Billed Cost Increase
1U edge box (8-core) 16 72 +350%
SMB 3-node cluster 72 216 +200%
Dense host (2×48-core) 96 96 0%
Without intervention, your licensing budget could balloon overnight—making core-first hardware decisions and license audits more critical than ever.

Five Proven Cost-Control Tactics

  1. Consolidate onto high-core servers Deploy servers with 32–64 cores per socket so each host meets or exceeds the 72-core threshold with fewer licenses.
  2. Collapse redundant product instances Share vCenter or VMware Cloud Foundation domains across workloads to avoid multiple 72-core minimums.
  3. Institute monthly license audits Identify idle clusters, stray test environments, and underutilized hosts; power them down or reassign licenses.
  4. Right-size hardware refreshes When replacing gear, favor CPUs with higher core counts and long-term ROI under the new rules.
  5. Pilot hypervisor alternatives Explore Microsoft Hyper-V, KVM/Proxmox, or Nutanix AHV to gain negotiation leverage and diversify your virtualization strategy.
These measures not only curb immediate cost spikes but also lay the groundwork for a more efficient, multicloud-ready infrastructure.
Infographic outlining five VMware cost-control tactics—collapse instances, consolidate servers, conduct monthly audits, right-size hardware, and explore hypervisor alternatives—to offset the 72-core licensing minimum introduced in April 2025.

Exploring Hypervisor Alternatives

When budgets tighten, alternative platforms can be powerful negotiation tools:

  • Microsoft Hyper-V
    Included with Windows Server Datacenter—no extra hypervisor licensing required and seamless Active Directory integration.
  • Proxmox
    Open-source and license-free. A steeper learning curve, yes, but unmatched flexibility and a vibrant community.
  • Public-Cloud Compute
    Shifting suitable VMs to AWS EC2, Azure VMs, or Google Compute can eliminate on-prem core licensing—at the expense of cloud optimization work.

Even if you remain primarily on VMware, running small pilots on these platforms gives you critical data points to negotiate better renewals.

Chart showcasing hypervisor alternatives to VMware—Microsoft Hyper-V, Proxmox, and public-cloud compute options like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud—used for cost reduction and licensing negotiation leverage.

Thinfinity Workspace: Decouple Access from Licensing

An effective long-term strategy is to separate application access from hypervisor licensing. That’s where Thinfinity Workspace shines:
Component Benefit Under 72-Core Rule
Thinfinity Workspace Browser-based portal for Windows, web, and SaaS apps—consistent UX regardless of underlying hypervisor or cloud platform, decoupling user access from core licensing costs.
Thinfinity Cloud Manager Unified control-plane to provision, scale, and cost-track workloads across.
Public Clouds: AWS EC2, Azure VMs, Google Compute Engine, OCI Compute, IONOS Cloud On-Prem Hypervisors: VMware vSphere & VMware Cloud Foundation, Microsoft Hyper-V, Proxmox VE.
By abstracting user access, you’re free to migrate VMs in sprints—rather than a risky big bang—while maintaining performance and security. This approach not only mitigates licensing risk but also accelerates your journey to a flexible, multicloud environment.
Diagram highlighting how Thinfinity Workspace and Cloud Manager decouple application access from VMware licensing, enabling phased VM migrations across on-prem and public cloud platforms under the 72-core rule.

90-Day Action Plan

  1. Audit & model your current core counts against the new 72-core minimum.
  2. Consolidate low-core hosts onto denser hardware.
  3. Stand up a Thinfinity Workspace PoC spanning VMware and an alternative hypervisor.
  4. Refresh hardware on a core-per-dollar basis where ROI is under 18 months.
  5. Negotiate renewals armed with pilot insights and alternative platform data.
Implementing this plan will stabilize licensing costs and set you up for more agile, secure operations.

Conclusion

The VMware licensing shift to a 72-core minimum poses a significant challenge—but it also offers a catalyst for infrastructure optimization. By combining consolidation strategies, alternative hypervisor pilots, and an abstraction layer like Thinfinity Workspace, you can both control costs and modernize your virtualization estate.
Thinfinity_logo
Ready to reclaim your budget?
Contact Cybele Software today to learn how Thinfinity Workspace and Cloud Manager can help.

Add Comment

Thinfinity-blue-logo
Modernize Beyond VMware Limits
Don’t let the 72-core rule dictate your infrastructure. Thinfinity Workspace provides unified access regardless of the hypervisor, easing migrations and enabling a flexible, cost-effective hybrid environment.

Blogs you might be interested in

<span>CIO</span>, <span>Cloud Service provider (CSP)</span>, <span>Cost Optimization</span>, <span>Cost Reduction</span>, <span>Hyper-V</span>, <span>Managed Service Providers (MSP)</span>, <span>Proxmox</span>, <span>SMB</span>, <span>VMware</span>, <span>VMware alternative</span>